Top online casino offer clients wide range of games and entertainment. Offer of games gaming establishments more voluminous than in regular casino clubs . Actually every online casino offers various казино Монро gaming entertainment and games for tables. In many web-casino as a bonus available gaming rooms, betting on sports games and additional entertainment.

Large number players online casinos chooses play with for money. To increase chances of success . characteristics and invent based on them a successful strategy.

How to choose the best gambling establishment Монро казино?

In the first place gamblers must not be forgotten that one-armed bandits, sports betting and gambling that they will find in gaming club, is not a way to become rich, but pleasure. No matter which online platform, selected by the gamer gambler, should establish in advance limit on possible loss. Exceed the limit not recommended under no circumstances.

For the most part chance of luck in slots is determined by conditions provided by gaming club. As a consequence of this, before registering in in a selected online casino , and play with real bets, guest needed carefully examine all collected information and evaluate all provided opportunities that the site provides. Let’s study it in more detail criteria, which need to be taken into account when choosing online casino.

Licenses at the online casino Монро казино

Users recommended to give preference to register an account entries always legal online casinos. Information about licensing, jurisdiction etc. . d. located on internet site gaming club Монро казино. Gaming clubs with a license publish on their web pages links leading to the regulator’s resource with documents confirming licensing.

Online clubs, with a license, according to the license obligated to provide guests safety during the game, fair payments and protection of personal data, input by users during registration and subsequent transactions. As required by the license online casinos must subject to regular audits independent specialists.

Users should pay attention, in which country the license was issued. Main jurisdictions for licensing for gaming clubs in the post-Soviet space – Curacao and Isle of Man. Special respect from gamblers call gambling establishments licensed issued in Europe (for example, in Malta or in Sweden or in Sweden or in Gibraltar).

Security of online casinos in online casinos Монро казино

During the selection casino must be taken into account, how safe it is to play on the platform. The player needs to study, what security methods does the casino use, and how security rules are implemented on the site and in the privacy policy.

Casinos with a license are required high technical requirements for the protection of user data. Today the standard for casinos is SSL encryption when transferring data to the server. A significant number of sites uses 128-bit protocol – which reduces the risk of data loss .

Personal information entered in an account, not accessible to third parties. Personal data and transaction information can only be seen by the user and the resource administration. Most casinos emphasizes in data protection rules that all casino staff are obliged not to disclose user personal data .

To protect data from hacking antivirus programs are used. They recognize bots and potentially malicious software. At every login from someone else’s IP, online casino, usually, conduct an audit, which includes several stages.

Game reviews about web gaming clubs

To make the right choice, the gamer should be considered comments and reviews on gaming websites, on web resources and in social networks,about gaming and casino topics. Worth exploring those gambling clubs who deserve praise both beginners, both game experts.

Need to consider on negative reviews. Their presence indicates that that reviews are written by real users.These opinions allow to know know in advance about probable difficulties and problems and understand whether a playground is suitable.

Gaming on mobile gadgets

An important advantage is availability of a mobile version of a site. This makes it easy play slot machines from computer and phone ,but also from mobile gadgets. Game in a convenient place place could be significant for the player if you need to fulfill bonus conditions or if he takes part in a tournament.

As a rule, mobile versions are similar to PC versions, – they have the whole range of slots. Users can log in with an existing account – it gives access to an account and bonuses.

For gaming from a phone or tablet gaming clubs offer download the application. Using it you can play when the connection is unstable,a demo works even without the Internet. The program allows you to play slots if access to the resource is blocked.

Game through a mirror site

Gaming sites make backup sites, to guarantee gaming -users stable access to all features when the main site is blocked by the ISP or in case of site maintenance. It is necessary thatso that the player has the opportunity at any moment go to a mirror resource.

Reliable Gaming Websites allow you to log in to your account on any available mirror. The funds on the balance remain, achievements in bonus wagering and progress. All mirror websites apply similar security tools, as on the main site.

To prevent fraud, the player should only use verified mirror sites.You can get the addresses of the mirrors through technical support or via email newsletter.

Catalog games

Main criterion, by which a player chooses a club, – list of slot machines in the catalogue. Assortment of online games notably different – usuallyincludes from a few hundred to a couple of thousand.

Most monro casino online casinos have slot machines the following classes:

• traditional fruit machines;
• themed video games;
• exclusive slot machines with original functions and principles;
• lightning slots;
• roulettes of old and high-tech types;
• games with cards (poker, blackjack, baccarat) and others.

Slots that are in the catalog differ in technical parameters, game options and game principles and features.They must be taken into account when selecting a machine to play. K for example, in classic slots and machines the game principles are as simple as possible, that’s why they are very popular among beginners. Video slots with many features require a well-thought-out strategy,this is why they are ideal for experienced players.

Gamers should not rely only on the number of slots in the catalog. On sites with a large catalog, convenient rubrication is important,which allows the user to select a slot taking into account all the criteria .Modern resources divide the catalog into sections by type of machine and name of developer, by the presence of certain technical parameters, highlight new and trending machines, etc.. Also in the directories modern online platforms use a variety of filters which sort slots by rating, return level, popularity, etc..

Game Providers

It is important for the gamer to familiarize himself with the providers who present their slots in the monro casino casino. partnerships with providers such asEndorphina, Yggdrasil, Betsoft and others. These developers are known for producing quality slots. However, younger companies can also supply reliable and interesting machines.

In addition to the range of providers and slots in a casino it is important , so that games are licensed. A license for slots is mandatory for legal sites.

The license confirms that all parameters of the slot correspond to thosewhich are indicated on the website developer. Winning combinations are generated based on a random number generator, which ensures fairness games. Illegal gaming sites use special programs that change the results of spins in favor of the casino.

To check if a slot is actually certified, the following steps must be followed:

• check the demo version of the slot (some casinos download demo versions from the developer’s website);
• open the menu and examine the element;
• find an SRC element to confirm a slot location. This indicates the reliability of the slot and monro casino casino.

Technical parameters of machines

When choosing a slot to play for money, the user should pay attention to the technical characteristics. The main parameters are the percentage of return of funds and volatility.

RTP is the ratio of winnings to the total number of bets. The higher the RTP, the higher the chance of winning. For example, with an RTP of 97%, out of 100 spins, 97 will win.

RTP of 96.5% is considered high. Beginner gamers are recommended to choose slots with high RTP. So the chances of winning will be higher.

Volatility determines the risk in the game. Slots can be low, medium and high volatility. With low volatility, the winnings are frequent, but small. With high volatility, winnings are large, but rare. Average volatility combines both.

RTP and volatility parameters are interrelated. High RTP slots tend to have high volatility.

When choosing a slot, you should pay attention to the bonuses. Bonuses increase your chances of winning.

Classic slots often have no bonuses. Most often these are free spins. Video slots have more opportunities. Usually these are special characters and symbols (Wild, Scatter , Bonus etc.), activate bonus rounds. Wild replaces regular symbols, Scatters give the right to free spins, bonuses trigger additional games.

Among the bonus features, the most common are:

• extra spins (free spins);
• Risk game – a bet for doubling, activated after each win;
• extra multipliers – used in bonus games;
• cascading symbols – winning symbols disappear, while there are wins on the field;
• expanding symbols – Wild covers the entire reel, increasing the probability of winning.

Win draws in machines

One of the most popular slots in the казино Монро casino – slots in which provides for a drawing main prize. During the game, the user receives a chance of large jackpot.

By type creating a prize prizes differ machines with fixed or progressive jackpot. First Kind ensures that always the winner gets fixed amount. Fixed amount jackpot determined in advance. Increasing jackpot accumulates with each new bet not winning money income.

In main casinos machines with jackpot highlighted prizes in a special category. On certain platforms progressive jackpot machines networked. Win a prize can a gamer who plays in any of the proposed combined slots.

Casino bonuses

In addition to the bonus functions in the machines, casinos offer encourages for the active gamers. Most bonuses are given users for actions on the site: account registration, replenishment of account, cash bets and other.

Among all the incentives that are used in the казино Монро online casino, most often these are found:

• deposit incentives – the amount of the bonus is part from the deposit;
• free spins – free spins in the slots specified;
• cashback – return of interest from the lost amount in machines for a period of time per week or month.

Refunds can be credited subject to additional conditions. Usually a website specifies a period for which bets are taken into account rates for calculating cashback. Also taken into account certain categories devices. Not taken into account board options, live games and more.

Many casinos offer a welcome gift to attract new players. Rules vary in different casinos: bonus given only on first deposit or for the first few deposits, include only percentage of amount or add additional prizes and etc. etc..

Online platforms offer differently no deposit bonuses. Some casinos use them because they are popular among players due to the fact that they allow you to get additional income no risk of loss. Other sites don’t give them, because they attract internet scammers. If the casino offers no deposit bonuses, most often for them apply additional conditions on wagering conditions, and the user must deposit account for a significant amount.

Loyalty programs

All online casinos seek attract new users, and retain their. Casinos use complex systems for the most active users.

For replenishing the balance and cash bets in games players are awarded points. On the sum of points the status depends client in the program rewards. When a user accumulates a certain amount incentives, user transfers to a new level. The essence of the loyalty program is is that at the next level open additional options: special conditions withdrawal money, wider limits for withdrawal, access to VIP tournaments and other.

How to withdraw bonuses

Casino bonuses – this is a loan. To withdraw funds withdraw bonus through the payment system, need to wager incentive.

The player rates variety of bonuses, but also rules for their wagering. This will help you understand, how much is the program useful to the player.

All available bonuses visible in the account client. To the bonus a description is provided – indicated there promotion amount and wagering period.

In every site limits are set for withdrawal of funds . If the bonus more than the limit, the user can withdraw money in parts .

Test markalı çeşitler kumar kaynağında Karavan bet casino

Çoğunlukla misafirler çevrimiçi hizmet Karavan casino giriş sunulan demo sürümleri çok düzeyli toplular. Bunlar mümkündür bük finansal yatırım olmadan, hesap açmadan.Bu özellik kullanıcılar göstermeden kimliğiniz. Demo sürümleri ayrıca değerli çünkü bunlar izin veriyor arayüz çevrimiçi kulüp ve mevcut yazılım olmadan finansal yatırım.temel edinilen beceriler yeni gelenler ve misafirler çok daha kolay olacak kaydolmaya karar verin sanal bir portalda.

Kumar oturumlarının avantajları kayıt prosedürünü gerçekleştirmeden

Eğitim modları cihazlar etkinleştirildi “Demo” tuşuyla, ki var kapakta. Tamamlandıktan sonra kurulumlar bedava Karavan bet etkinleştir seç miktar oyun zincirleri, etkinleştirme mezhep değeri, bahis yap ve makaraların dönüşünü teşvik edin.Ödemeler eğitim formatı tahakkuk etti oyun koşullarına göre emülatör, hangileri yayınlandı yardım bölümü.

Amaç deneme dönüşleri kullanıcılar verilen özel çipler. Toplamları oldukça kolay bakın tamamlandıktan sonra başlatılıyor slotun demo sürümü demo hesabında. İhtiyaç doğduğunda özel paralar anında yeniden canlandırıldı by sayfayı yeniden yükleyerek.Katılımlarıyla yapılan ödül kombinasyonları için kredi verildi aynı bedava madeni paralar hangi amaçlanmadı para çekme için gönder kumarhane’dan. Birikmiş tüm krediler iptal edilecek sonuç olarak yeniden başlatma veya kapatma sayfa.

Özellikler sanal makine demo modu

Spin çalıştırma eğitim modunda, kumarbazlar internet kulübü Karavan casino giriş yapabilir:

• sonuç çıkarmak hakkında dağılım göstergeleri ve dönüş yasal cihazlar;
• düşünceli öğrenmek kurallar slot makineleri ;
• geçmek riskli ve kazanma döngülerinin karlılığını karakterize edin;
• bilinen stratejileri test edin ve geliştirin kişisel taktikler.

Böylece, yeni gelenler ve misafirler sağlandı ideal şans – kayıt yok çalışma mevcut sertifikalı yuvalar, böylece gelecekte etkinleştir elde edilen bilgiler gerçek bahisler yaparken.Benzer seçenek aktif olarak kullanılıyor değil yalnızca deneyimsizler, ama aynı zamanda deneyimli ziyaretçiler.

Oyun slot makineleri, mevcut yetkisiz

Bir oyun hizmetinde demo versiyonları var hemen hemen hepsi resmi cihazlar.Oyuncular yapabilir hesap açmadan etkinleştir klasik tür oyunlar basitleştirilmiş oyun ve güncellenmiş video slotları ile üç boyutlu grafik öğeleri ve ek özellikler. Aynı zamanda demo kontroller ücretsiz olarak kullanılabilir anlık oyunlar. Kurallarına göre ödül tutarını biriktirmek için gerekli başarılı basit bir ekstra tur oynayın.

Ücretsiz turlar benzer mevcut amatörler. Oyuncular yapabilecek döndür makineler ile popüler kart disiplinleri, rulet ve kraps. ayrı kumarhanelerde demo modu simülatörler için mevcut bingo ve keno ile.

İlgili değil test için kaydırmalar yalnızca canlı oyunlar gerçek krupiyeler ile. masaüstü bilgisayarlar ve kart emülatörlerinde canlı formatta Oyna katılımcılar yalnızca sonuç olarak profil oluşturma ve bakiyeyi yenileme.

test test

Photodisc/Thinkstock A Petaluma man has been arrested after being found with over 600 images of child pornography. On June 4th, a search warrant was executed at the home of Hugo Barajas, stemming from a tip related to illegal, obscene, digital images.Gay porno Electronic devices belonging to Barajas were located and seized. Then last Wednesday, police arrested Barajas for possessing images or data of people 18 years old or younger engaging in or simulating sexual conduct. As he was found with over 600 images, Barajas could face a more serious punishment if convicted.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Best XXX porno video. Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Best XXX porno video. Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.