“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Best XXX porno video. Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Best XXX porno video. Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

“Research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores,” according to a recent article in The Washington Post. stock.adobe.com Share As far as I’m concerned, they can’t put warning labels on social media websites soon enough.Gay porno Indeed, I’d go a lot further. I’d consider banning smartphones altogether for children under 16. Me, I’m so old I can remember when what Vice President Al Gore called “the information superhighway” was going to usher in a new Golden Age of enlightenment and democratic well-being. Instead, we got flat-earth theorists, high school boys sending “d—k pics” to girls in their geometry class, porn addiction and MAGA. Turns out most people, adolescents in particular, don’t need (and certainly haven’t got the critical thinking skills to cope with) the veritable tsunami of titillation, disinformation and delusion that comes pouring in over the internet. I was recently shocked to learn from a friend who’s a high school teacher that her students are permitted to bring cellphones to class. What can educators responsible for this situation have been thinking? They may as well shut down classes altogether. There’s no chance of getting and keeping high school kids’ attention with the accursed things buzzing in their pockets. Back in my own school days, teachers pretended they were unaware of boys carrying transistor radios during the World Series, but that was a special circumstance — not smutty videos or digitally created nude photos of our female classmates. If we had any sense as a culture, we’d recognize that putting smartphones in the hands of children and adolescents makes about as much sense as handing out whiskey sours in the school cafeteria. According to a recent article in The Washington Post, “research finds a correlation between cellphone use and lower grades and test scores.” How could it be otherwise? Furthermore, “a recent Gallup poll shows teens spend an average of nearly five hours a day just on social media — not including games and texts. A report by Common Sense Media finds teens check their phones an average of more than 100 times a day.” Social scientist Jonathan Haidt, who has made a personal crusade out of warning against what he sees as the dire effects of cellphone addiction, noted: “I recently surveyed my students at NYU, and most of them reported that the very first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is check their texts, direct messages and social media feeds. It’s also the last thing they do before they close their eyes at night.” Some think Haidt has contributed to what one academic critic calls a “moral panic” scaring parents needlessly. He counters by pointing to studies showing the typical American adolescent “now gets 237 notifications a day, roughly 15 every waking hour.” I’m sorry, but that’s crazy. And crazy-making, too. According to U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, writing in The New York Times: “The mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms, and the average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours. Additionally, nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.” It’s not just in the United States either. Haidt has pointed out the skyrocketing rates of adolescent depression and suicide — they rose more than 50% between 2010 and 2019, when widespread smartphone use began. “Similar patterns emerged around the same time in Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, the Nordic countries, and beyond,” he said. Basically, anywhere the wonders of the information superhighway were bestowed willy-nilly upon the young. Academic achievement began to slide around the same time. It’s gotten to where a teenager reading a book is a rare phenomenon. We’re raising a semi-literate generation. No wonder they’re so easily bamboozled by Russian propaganda. Nobody meant for these things to happen, but by encouraging near-universal cellphone usage among the young, with social media algorithms designed to lure users ever deeper into the online world, we’ve been conducting a vast, uncontrolled social experiment with unforeseen results on the most vulnerable members of society. Skeptics point to other potential causes — financial panics, mass school shootings and active shooter drills, the COVID pandemic, the opioid crisis, even global climate change. But while these events might have been contributing factors in some countries, none can explain both the timing and international scope of the disaster. The good news is the damage can be reversed if we have the will. Washington Post columnist Kate Cohen writes of visiting a high school near Albany where cellphones have been banned to nearly everybody’s satisfaction — including students’, many of whom say they’re relieved not to have to deal with the constant intrusion. That should happen everywhere, and for pretty much the same reason we don’t serve whiskey sours in school cafeterias. Kids can’t handle them. Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.” Send letters to letters@suntimes.com Share © 2024 Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc.

Photodisc/Thinkstock A Petaluma man has been arrested after being found with over 600 images of child pornography. On June 4th, a search warrant was executed at the home of Hugo Barajas, stemming from a tip related to illegal, obscene, digital images.Gay porno Electronic devices belonging to Barajas were located and seized. Then last Wednesday, police arrested Barajas for possessing images or data of people 18 years old or younger engaging in or simulating sexual conduct. As he was found with over 600 images, Barajas could face a more serious punishment if convicted.

Photodisc/Thinkstock A Petaluma man has been arrested after being found with over 600 images of child pornography. On June 4th, a search warrant was executed at the home of Hugo Barajas, stemming from a tip related to illegal, obscene, digital images.Gay porno Electronic devices belonging to Barajas were located and seized. Then last Wednesday, police arrested Barajas for possessing images or data of people 18 years old or younger engaging in or simulating sexual conduct. As he was found with over 600 images, Barajas could face a more serious punishment if convicted.

On internet portal Волна Казино constant interest use licensed devices with jackpot draw. Such video slots interest gamblers the potential to receive a big win payout, several dozen times exceeding the standard winnings in devices.

To win a big prize needed turn on real format in slot machines with cumulative system. Quite often online services post such volnacasino in heading of the same name. On some sites progressive jackpot is added in all titles reel type. Such aspect in detail mentioned in the rules promotional offer.

Terms of the Promotional Offer

Progressive fund accumulated in gaming slot machines step-by-step on the basis of contributions what perform guests internet casino. From even the minimum contribution of money per round a transfer is made a certain %. Money supplement a prize pool until paid out the owner of the large cash reward. The value of the the cumulative system at the moment is permitted behold on the main page of the gambling web project or in a separate menu subsection. After the jackpot winner is determined the total value accumulate repeatedly.

In a number of online clubs funds to the general savings fund are transferred from sponsors, for instance, manufacturers of virtual devices. Under such starting conditions jackpot will be relevant solely in video slots of a specific provider. On top online services several of valuable bonuses can be simultaneously played out, for example, mini, medium and grand. For each of them individual collection of highly volatile machines is formed .

How to collect cumulative prize fund

Jackpot is is given to users of the gambling club казино Volna according to a random algorithm. Jackpot hit defines added into multi-line emulators RNG system. Accordingly, to achieve dropping a solid payout by the method of using various tactics and plans is unrealistic. Intensity and magnitude investments in the same way do not have a decisive effect.

To have a big reward must only more often play in the format for real money. Big Win can appear at any instant both in the main round and in the auxiliary. This should testify characteristic text tab on the playing field.

Fixed Jackpot

In addition to progressive prize pools, in certified automatic machines are found fixed activated. Large cash rewards of this format are fixed by providers at phase of manufacturing of software. Almost always this is the maximum amount that it is permitted to hit in one-armed bandit. The maximum jackpot amount is indicated by the developers in the corresponding slot menu.

To get a fixed large cash prize usually needed form a winning combination of several repeating special pictures (Wild, Scatter or Bonus). In a winning combination must be the maximum permissible number of symbols. As a result the amount of money will be automatically transferred to the deposit. Quite often the largest stable jackpots are provided in recently released simulators with wider functionality.

The Euro 2024 match between Germany and Denmark had to be suspended on Saturday as a result of adverse weather conditions in Dortmund. The game was paused during the first half as thunder and lightning was heard and seen close to Borussia Dortmund’s Signal Iduna Park. Referee Michael Oliver halted the action and took the players to the touchline, while consulting with competition officials over the best course of action.Best porn XXX. He then led an exodus from the pitch and dugouts down the tunnel. The Sporting News explains what happened. Germany vs. Denmark has been temporarily suspended due to a thunderstorm. pic.twitter.com/ZywIB7zbnX MORE: Germany vs. Denmark LIVE updates from Dortmund in Euro 2024 The Euro 2024 Round of 16 game between Germany and Denmark had to be suspended due to the risks posed by a storm breaking in the local area in Dortmund, Germany. Thunder and lightning preceded rain and then hail. Water could be seen pouring in torrents from the stadium roof after players and staff had been led inside. The game, which was 0-0 at the time, eventually resumed after a lengthy stoppage once the danger of the storm subsided. Within 15 minutes, the players were allowed back out onto the pitch for a five-minute warm-up, before the resumption of the game. The match restarted with Toni Kroos in possession for Germany — the hosts had the ball when the game was halted — with the clock resuming at 34:55. These lightning strikes over Signal Iduna Park in Dortmund 😳⚡️ pic.twitter.com/4225PIlhm4 MORE: Euro 2024 schedule and results, updated LIVE | Who will win Euro 2024? Latest odds and predictions | How to watch all the Euro 2024 action  Many fans noticed that, even after play had been suspended, the match clock did not stop. TV broadcasters, including FOX in the United States, had the clock continue to run in their scoreboard graphic even as the players left the pitch following the pause in the game. However, this was likely more of an issue with television graphics. The official match clock was halted when play was suspended and then it resumed at 34:55. Michael Oliver is the referee for the Round of 16 match between Germany and Denmark. The Englishman, who has extensive experience in the Premier League, led a team of mostly English officials for the fixture in Dortmund, including Stuart Attwell on VAR. Joe is Senior Editor (Football) at Sporting News.